norm1e69 vs Uruguabot

norm1e69 and Uruguabot are both filed under Crypto Markets. Both are automated bots, and both are paid. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.

norm1e69 preview

Self-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5- and 15-minute crypto Up or Down windows, sold as full source for a single payment and named after the public Polymarket account its seller points to as proof.

Compared with Uruguabot
Uruguabot preview

Uruguabot

Verified Partner

Self-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5-minute BTC and ETH up/down markets, sold with its complete live trading record — losses included.

Compared with norm1e69

At a glance

Factnorm1e69Uruguabot
TypeAutomated botAutomated bot
CategoryCrypto MarketsCrypto Markets
Also listed inScalpingMomentum
PricingPaidPaid
Priceone-timeone-time
Risk ratingLow riskHigh risk
MarketsBTC up/down · 5m, ETH up/down · 5m, SOL up/down · 5m and 1 moreBTC up/down · 5m, ETH up/down · 5m, BTC/ETH up/down · 15m (tested in gen 1)
SourceSource included with purchaseSource included with purchase
Runs in TelegramNoNo
Listed sinceOct 2, 2026Aug 20, 2026

Highlighted rows differ

Key differences

  • Both list BTC up/down · 5m and ETH up/down · 5m; norm1e69 adds SOL up/down · 5m and BTC up/down · 15m; Uruguabot adds BTC/ETH up/down · 15m (tested in gen 1).
  • norm1e69 is rated low risk, Uruguabot high risk.
  • Only norm1e69 is filed under Scalping, and only Uruguabot is filed under Momentum.

Choose norm1e69 if…

  • you trade SOL up/down · 5m and BTC up/down · 15m
  • you prefer the lower-risk profile (low vs high)
  • your focus is Scalping

Choose Uruguabot if…

  • you trade BTC/ETH up/down · 15m (tested in gen 1)
  • your focus is Momentum

What norm1e69 does

Self-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5- and 15-minute crypto Up or Down windows, sold as full source for a single payment and named after the public Polymarket account its seller points to as proof. It does not predict direction: it buys both Up and Down through each window on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana, mostly at the ask, holds every position to settlement and redeems the winnings. By the vendor's own breakdown the timing of those buys roughly pays the taker fee, and more than half of the net comes from Polymarket's fee rebates at a high volume tier. Paper mode, a daily loss limit, an exposure cap and Telegram reports are built in.

Features
  • Full Python source, run on your own computer or VPS; the wallet key stays in a local .env file
  • Buys both Up and Down across the whole window, mostly as taker orders with resting limit bids alongside; never sells, holds to settlement
  • Paper mode: simulated orders against the live order book, settled with Polymarket's real results, with every fee charged and your own rebate tier applied
  • Daily loss limit that cancels open orders, halts trading and messages you; exposure cap that pauses new buys
  • Automatic redemption of winning shares after each window settles (needs a little POL for gas)
How it trades
  • The pitch is a public account instead of a screenshot, and the account checks out. On Oct 2, 2026 Polymarket's own APIs showed @norm1e69 opened on Aug 7, 2026, a profile profit curve at $206,805, about $14.6 million traded, sixth place on the month's Crypto leaderboard by profit and a deepest fall of $489 on the hourly curve — the figures the site prints. The last 500 activity rows were 486 buys and 14 redemptions with no sells, spread over BTC, SOL and ETH 5-minute windows and BTC 15-minute ones.
  • Read the top number the way the vendor itself tells you to. The profile chart is before taker fees and without rebates. Over a four-day sample the site reports +$26,040 before fees, $20,262 paid in taker fees and $7,937 received in rebates: about $13,700 net, or 1.10% of volume. Polymarket's all-time leaderboard credits the same account with roughly $50,000, not $206,805. The site counts 56 of 56 days closed up; our cut of the same hourly series found one small down day, −$147 in mid-August.
  • That result leans on size. The account trades more than $10 million a month and gets a large share of its taker fees back; a small account pays the same fee and gets 3% back at the lowest tier. The vendor says so plainly: you will probably not make the same profit, and at small size the fees can outweigh the edge. Run paper mode with your own tier before funding a wallet.

What Uruguabot does

Self-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5-minute BTC and ETH up/down markets, sold with its complete live trading record — losses included. A free GitHub repo publishes every fill from two generations of testing plus a 1,934-window study in which every automated signal scored roughly coin-flip against the human's 59%; the published numbers reproduce exactly from the raw CSVs, though the logs omit market ids, so the record is self-attested rather than on-chain verifiable. Both generations together lost about $270 — mostly execution and a since-fixed ghost-fill bug — while the configuration that ships as default closed its live run at +7.3% ROI on a 40% win rate over a small 25-trade sample: momentum entries, stop re-anchored to execution price minus 10¢, winners held to binary resolution. Dry-run is the default, with fills simulated from slippage measured on real trades; live mode takes two explicit flags and a dedicated wallet.

Features
  • Full Python source, one-time purchase, bilingual EN/ES docs
  • Published trade-by-trade record on GitHub: 4,086 gen-1 trades, 97 live gen-2 fills, raw CSVs under CC BY 4.0
  • Dry-run simulator calibrated with slippage distributions measured from real fills, not zero-friction backtests
  • Ghost-fill detection via USDC balance delta with on-chain fallback — the bug it fixes cost more than the strategy earned
  • Asymmetric exits: stop at execution minus 10¢, winners held to $1 resolution
How it trades
  • Enters on multi-timeframe momentum consensus (30s/1m/5m) with entry gates — but the published audit shows the edge came from exit asymmetry, not prediction accuracy.
  • Cuts losers at execution price minus 10¢ and holds winners to binary resolution, so average wins run about 3× average losses at a 40% win rate.
  • Simulates first by default using friction measured from its own real fills, then requires deliberate opt-in for live trading.

More head-to-heads

Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.