BotRanked vs PolyScope

BotRanked and PolyScope are both filed under Platforms & Tools and Sports Trading and 1 more. Both are trading platforms, and both are free. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.

BotRanked preview

BotRanked

Verified Partner

Free public leaderboard of up to 300 Polymarket wallets that trade like bots, read from Polymarket's own public P&L data rather than from seller screenshots and refreshed every hour.

Compared with PolyScope
PolyScope preview

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site.

Compared with BotRanked

At a glance

FactBotRankedPolyScope
TypeTrading platformTrading platform
CategoryPlatforms & ToolsPlatforms & Tools
Also listed inSports Trading, Crypto Markets, ScalpingCopy Trading, Sports Trading, Politics & Elections, Crypto Markets, Sentiment / News
PricingFreeFree
Pricefreefree
Risk ratingMedium riskMedium risk
MarketsPolymarket (wallets scored) and Kalshi (not covered — Kalshi publishes no account IDs)All Polymarket markets
SourceSource not publishedSource not published
Runs in TelegramNoNo
Listed sinceOct 26, 2026Nov 13, 2026

Highlighted rows differ

Key differences

  • They cover different markets: BotRanked lists Polymarket (wallets scored) and Kalshi (not covered — Kalshi publishes no account IDs), PolyScope lists All Polymarket markets.
  • Only BotRanked is filed under Scalping, and only PolyScope is filed under Copy Trading and Politics & Elections and 1 more.

Choose BotRanked if…

  • you trade Polymarket (wallets scored) and Kalshi (not covered — Kalshi publishes no account IDs)
  • your focus is Scalping

Choose PolyScope if…

  • you trade All Polymarket markets
  • your focus is Copy Trading and Politics & Elections and 1 more

What BotRanked does

Free public leaderboard of up to 300 Polymarket wallets that trade like bots, read from Polymarket's own public P&L data rather than from seller screenshots and refreshed every hour. Each bot gets what it kept after fees, how much of that came from Polymarket's rebates and rewards, its trading result without them, weeks up out of the last 12, max drawdown and profit per $1K traded, and a label for where the money comes from: edge, edge plus rebates, rebate-driven, rebates covering a trading loss, or losing. Bots are ranked by the last 30 days, can be filtered by market — 5-minute, 15-minute and hourly crypto, sports and esports, events — and losers and bots that went idle stay on the board. Every bot has its own page with a chart of net kept against trading after fees, and the full dataset is public as JSON.

Features
  • Leaderboard of up to 300 bot wallets ranked by net kept over the last 30 days, with all-time kept, trading after fees, weeks up out of 12, max drawdown, profit per $1K traded and start date
  • Splits every result into trading after fees and rebates, and labels the profit source: edge, edge + rebates, rebate-driven, rebates cover losses or losing
  • Filters by market type and by active or idle bots, plus search by bot name or wallet
  • A daily scan that picks wallets by trading behaviour alone — fills per hour, longest pause, order-size repetition — never by profit
  • Bot pages with a chart of net kept against trading after fees over 30 days, 90 days, a year or all time
How it trades
  • A scoreboard, not a bot: use it to check a seller's claims, or to see whether a wallet you want to copy makes money from trading or from Polymarket's rebates, which a smaller account will not earn at the same rate.
  • Read the profit-source label first. On Oct 26, 2026, 40 of the 300 listed bots were in profit only because rebates covered a trading loss, and of the 20 best 5-minute crypto bots over the last 30 days only 4 made less than a fifth of their result from rebates.
  • “Bot” is an inference: wallets are picked by an always-on, high-volume trading pattern, which busy humans, shared accounts and copy services can match too, and one operator can run several wallets. The methodology page says so.

What PolyScope does

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site. It picks 78 wallets for steady rather than large profit — a smooth equity curve, low concentration in a few markets, profit across many months — and shows each as a card with its niche (sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto or other), a stability score, its P&L, median position size, win rate, median return and share of profitable months, with a link to the full address. Cards flag wallets whose usual position is too big to copy on a normal account. Profiles are rebuilt overnight from Polymarket's data. There is no account, payment or alert; the site earns from referral links to the Overdog trading bot.

Features
  • 78 wallet profiles with combined P&L and a “data as of” date for the last rebuild
  • Stability score and sorting by stability or P&L
  • Filters by niche: sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto and other
  • Per wallet: P&L, median position size, win rate, median ROI, concentration and share of profitable months
  • “Accessible” or “High-capital” tag by median position size
How it trades
  • The selection idea is the right one for anyone thinking of copying: rank wallets by how evenly they made money, not by how much, and say outright which ones are too big to follow. The research page behind it describes cutting 512 profitable wallets to 314 and testing rules out of sample, and the about page promises limitations next to every result. Those are better habits than most wallet leaderboards show.
  • The P&L figures are close to Polymarket's but not the same. On Nov 13, 2026 the top three cards showed $31,930, $30,537 and $332,175 of “true P&L”; Polymarket's all-time profit for the same addresses was $30,720, $30,056 and $279,484. The site does not define “true P&L”, so we cannot say which way the third, 19% apart, is right. Every card we saw showed a 100% win rate, and the “earns from” and “current conviction” fields were empty or “no open positions” on the cards we looked at, so for now the dossier tells you who did well, not what they hold.
  • It is a free page on a content site, not a product with alerts or an API, and the commercial side is Overdog: a banner on the dossier and a review on the blog. The about page says referral links are marked rel="sponsored", and the disclaimer says the site is not affiliated with any platform it covers. Its editorial standards say it does not publish exact profit figures for traders it did not interview; the dossier, which publishes full addresses with exact P&L, does not follow that rule. A Polymarket builder named PolyScope with $548K of volume and 49 users appears in Polymarket's leaderboard; nothing on the site links to it.

More head-to-heads

Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.