GoodFallen vs Uruguabot
GoodFallen and Uruguabot are both filed under Crypto Markets. Both are automated bots, and both are paid. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.

GoodFallen
Editor's ChoiceSelf-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5- and 15-minute crypto Up or Down windows, sold as full source for $399 once and backed by the public Polymarket account its seller runs it on, @GoodFallen.
Compared with Uruguabot
Uruguabot
Verified PartnerSelf-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5-minute BTC and ETH up/down markets, sold with its complete live trading record — losses included.
Compared with GoodFallenAt a glance
| Fact | GoodFallen | Uruguabot |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Automated bot | Automated bot |
| Category | Crypto Markets | Crypto Markets |
| Also listed in | Scalping | Momentum |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Price | one-time | one-time |
| Risk rating | Low risk | High risk |
| Markets | BTC up/down · 5m, ETH up/down · 5m, SOL up/down · 5m and 1 more | BTC up/down · 5m, ETH up/down · 5m, BTC/ETH up/down · 15m (tested in gen 1) |
| Source | Source included with purchase | Source included with purchase |
| Runs in Telegram | No | No |
| Listed since | Oct 20, 2026 | Aug 20, 2026 |
Highlighted rows differ
Key differences
- Both list BTC up/down · 5m and ETH up/down · 5m; GoodFallen adds SOL up/down · 5m and BTC up/down · 15m; Uruguabot adds BTC/ETH up/down · 15m (tested in gen 1).
- GoodFallen is rated low risk, Uruguabot high risk.
- Only GoodFallen is filed under Scalping, and only Uruguabot is filed under Momentum.
- GoodFallen carries the editor's choice mark in the catalog.
- Uruguabot has been listed since Aug 20, 2026; GoodFallen joined on Oct 20, 2026.
Choose GoodFallen if…
- you trade SOL up/down · 5m and BTC up/down · 15m
- you prefer the lower-risk profile (low vs high)
- your focus is Scalping
Choose Uruguabot if…
- you trade BTC/ETH up/down · 15m (tested in gen 1)
- your focus is Momentum
What GoodFallen does
Self-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5- and 15-minute crypto Up or Down windows, sold as full source for $399 once and backed by the public Polymarket account its seller runs it on, @GoodFallen. It does not call direction: through each window it buys both Up and Down in small pieces, some at the ask and some as resting bids, never sells, and redeems the winning side after settlement. Taker fees eat most of the trading result, and Polymarket's daily rebates, which grow with volume, make up half of what the account keeps. Paper mode, a daily loss limit, an exposure cap, a stop file and Telegram reports are built in.
Features- Full Python source, run on your own computer or VPS; orders go straight from your machine to Polymarket and the wallet key stays there
- Buys both Up and Down through the window, at the ask and as resting bids; never sells, holds to settlement
- Paper mode on live order books and real settlements, charging every taker fee and adding only the rebate rate you set, zero by default
- Daily loss limit that cancels open orders and halts trading, an exposure cap and a STOP file
- Winning shares redeemed automatically about a minute after each close
- The account checks out. On Oct 20, 2026 Polymarket's APIs showed @GoodFallen opened on Jul 16, 2026, $10.8 million traded across 23,276 markets, a profile profit of $192,667 before fees and 13th place on the month's Crypto leaderboard by profit. Its last 500 actions were 486 buys and 14 redemptions, with no sells.
- The site does the fee arithmetic itself, and the numbers hold. Polymarket's P&L feed puts the trading result at +$192,667 and taker fees at $126,223; the account's activity feed lists $60,015 in taker rebates over 93 daily payouts and $6,950 more for its resting orders. That leaves about $133,400 net, the figure the site prints, and half of it is rebates. Polymarket's all-time leaderboard, which counts fees but not rebates, credits the account with $66,252. Rebuilt from the same data, the daily log matches the site's: 80 of 95 days in profit, the worst −$1,658 on Sep 15.
- Two things the page does not stress. The account trades almost only Bitcoin's 5-minute windows: in samples spread over three months we found Ethereum once and no Solana or 15-minute fills, so the other markets the bot supports have no public record here. And both sides does not mean balanced: in a typical window the smaller side was about two-thirds of the larger, and the window the site charted when we read it held 155 Up shares against 378 Down, so each window still leans one way.
What Uruguabot does
Self-hosted Python bot for Polymarket's 5-minute BTC and ETH up/down markets, sold with its complete live trading record — losses included. A free GitHub repo publishes every fill from two generations of testing plus a 1,934-window study in which every automated signal scored roughly coin-flip against the human's 59%; the published numbers reproduce exactly from the raw CSVs, though the logs omit market ids, so the record is self-attested rather than on-chain verifiable. Both generations together lost about $270 — mostly execution and a since-fixed ghost-fill bug — while the configuration that ships as default closed its live run at +7.3% ROI on a 40% win rate over a small 25-trade sample: momentum entries, stop re-anchored to execution price minus 10¢, winners held to binary resolution. Dry-run is the default, with fills simulated from slippage measured on real trades; live mode takes two explicit flags and a dedicated wallet.
Features- Full Python source, one-time purchase, bilingual EN/ES docs
- Published trade-by-trade record on GitHub: 4,086 gen-1 trades, 97 live gen-2 fills, raw CSVs under CC BY 4.0
- Dry-run simulator calibrated with slippage distributions measured from real fills, not zero-friction backtests
- Ghost-fill detection via USDC balance delta with on-chain fallback — the bug it fixes cost more than the strategy earned
- Asymmetric exits: stop at execution minus 10¢, winners held to $1 resolution
- Enters on multi-timeframe momentum consensus (30s/1m/5m) with entry gates — but the published audit shows the edge came from exit asymmetry, not prediction accuracy.
- Cuts losers at execution price minus 10¢ and holds winners to binary resolution, so average wins run about 3× average losses at a 40% win rate.
- Simulates first by default using friction measured from its own real fills, then requires deliberate opt-in for live trading.
More head-to-heads
Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.