Cohven vs OVERROUND
Cohven and OVERROUND are both filed under Platforms & Tools and Copy Trading and 1 more. Both are trading platforms, and both are paid. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.
At a glance
| Fact | Cohven | OVERROUND |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Trading platform | Trading platform |
| Category | Platforms & Tools | Platforms & Tools |
| Also listed in | Copy Trading, Sentiment / News, Hedging | Copy Trading, Sentiment / News |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Price | from $29/mo | $19/month |
| Risk rating | Medium risk | Medium risk |
| Markets | Polymarket markets held by the wallets you track | All 61 Polymarket category boards, CTF Exchange & NegRisk fills, Resolved-event records |
| Source | Source not published | Source not published |
| Runs in Telegram | No | No |
| Listed since | Nov 7, 2026 | Aug 27, 2026 |
Highlighted rows differ
Key differences
- Both are paid, but on different terms: Cohven is from $29/mo, OVERROUND is $19/month.
- They cover different markets: Cohven lists Polymarket markets held by the wallets you track, OVERROUND lists All 61 Polymarket category boards and CTF Exchange & NegRisk fills and 1 more.
- Only Cohven is filed under Hedging.
- OVERROUND has been listed since Aug 27, 2026; Cohven joined on Nov 7, 2026.
Choose Cohven if…
- you trade Polymarket markets held by the wallets you track
- your focus is Hedging
Choose OVERROUND if…
- you trade All 61 Polymarket category boards and CTF Exchange & NegRisk fills and 1 more
What Cohven does
Polymarket wallet tracker that shows positions rather than single trades. You add up to 30 public addresses; Cohven rebuilds each portfolio from Polygon, lists every position that three or more of them hold at once, and works out how far your own account is from that group, in shares and dollars. You place any trades yourself. A whale tracker page and a track record are free to read. The app starts with a 7-day trial on an email address, with no card, and then costs $29 to $149 a month depending on how many wallets you follow, prepaid in USDC.
Features- Portfolios rebuilt from trades, splits, merges and redemptions on Polygon, with entry prices
- A position counts as consensus once 3 wallets hold the same side, and the count is shown on every row
- Each position shown as a share of its owner's equity, so wallets of different sizes compare
- Gap view: the difference between your book and the group in shares and dollars, with the group's average and worst entry
- Alerts when the group moves
- The public record is the best thing here, and it is more modest than its headline. We downloaded the CSV on Nov 7, 2026: 3,307 resolved positions, 71.2% on the group's side, +$14.5 million of realised P&L. But the average entry was 69.5¢, so a 71% win rate is roughly what those prices already implied. Held to resolution, that is about 1.8¢ per share before fees. The realised P&L is 2.5% on $570 million of cost, and the 33 best positions, 1% of the list, made nearly half of it.
- Agreement did not help on cheap outcomes. The 850 positions entered under 50¢ paid 23.2¢ on average and won 15.1% of the time, a loss of about 8¢ a share if held to resolution; the realised figure for that group is close to flat, because wallets also sold before the end. Some of these may be hedges rather than bets, and the CSV does not say.
- The history also needs reading with care. The domain dates from Aug 22, 2026, while the record runs back to Jul 2024, using wallets that were picked later and that were already known to have done well. Only 386 positions were first bought after the domain existed: they won 72.5% at a 69.2¢ average entry and made 2.8% on cost, which is a fairer sample but a short one. The site does say the group is chosen by users, that past results guarantee nothing, and that wallets of very different sizes are added together. A follower also never gets the group's entry. The delay is deliberate, and rows on the site show entries of 57¢ and 75¢ with prices now at 91¢ and 98¢. The account-size calculator on the home page, which shows +11.5% in three months, is labelled a model.
What OVERROUND does
Analytics platform that ranks public Polymarket wallets by skill-adjusted accuracy instead of profit. Every resolved position is graded against the price the wallet actually paid — a 30¢ winner counts as a win the market already priced at 30% — and scores are computed over independent resolved events, so neither a hot streak nor a hundred legs of the same question can pass as a track record. 484,966 wallet-category records across 61 boards, a free checker that returns a verdict with a 95% interval on whether any wallet's record is distinguishable from luck, and alerts on email and Telegram within minutes when a tracked forecaster changes position. Every alert it has ever sent is graded in public with losses left on the page: 409–245 on 654 resolved markets when we listed it.
Features- Skill board: 484,966 wallet-category records ranked by accuracy in excess of the entry price
- Free wallet checker — three lookups a day, verdict with a 95% interval
- Conviction alerts on Telegram and email, typically minutes after the move lands on-chain
- Receipts ledger grading every alert ever sent, mechanically, losses included
- Calibration diagrams and graded event history on top-of-board wallets
- Scores accuracy against the price paid rather than money made, then weights each record by how much independent evidence it actually contains — the public board's floor is 20 resolved events.
- Counts only positions held on one side through resolution; correlated legs inside one event family count once, and the 5-minute Up/Down series is excluded by policy.
- Alerts fire when an already-graded wallet acts with unusual conviction by its own history, not when a large wallet moves.
More head-to-heads
Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.

