polymarket-tennis vs PolyScope

polymarket-tennis and PolyScope are both filed under Sports Trading and Platforms & Tools. Both are trading platforms, and both are free. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.

polymarket-tennis preview

Open-source Python toolkit that lines up Polymarket's tennis markets with the matches they are about.

Compared with PolyScope
PolyScope preview

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site.

Compared with polymarket-tennis

At a glance

Factpolymarket-tennisPolyScope
TypeTrading platformTrading platform
CategorySports TradingPlatforms & Tools
Also listed inPlatforms & ToolsCopy Trading, Sports Trading, Politics & Elections, Crypto Markets, Sentiment / News
PricingFreeFree
Pricefree · MITfree
Risk ratingLow riskMedium risk
MarketsPolymarket tennis markets: ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF match winners, set winners, game totals and futuresAll Polymarket markets
SourceOpen-sourceSource not published
Runs in TelegramNoNo
Listed sinceNov 9, 2026Nov 13, 2026

Highlighted rows differ

Key differences

  • They cover different markets: polymarket-tennis lists Polymarket tennis markets: ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF match winners, set winners, game totals and futures, PolyScope lists All Polymarket markets.
  • polymarket-tennis publishes its code under an open-source licence; PolyScope does not publish its source.
  • polymarket-tennis is rated low risk, PolyScope medium risk.
  • Only PolyScope is filed under Copy Trading and Politics & Elections and 2 more.

Choose polymarket-tennis if…

  • you want to read — and keep running — the code yourself
  • you trade Polymarket tennis markets: ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF match winners, set winners, game totals and futures
  • you prefer the lower-risk profile (low vs medium)

Choose PolyScope if…

  • you trade All Polymarket markets
  • your focus is Copy Trading and Politics & Elections and 2 more

What polymarket-tennis does

Open-source Python toolkit that lines up Polymarket's tennis markets with the matches they are about. It lists open tennis markets from Polymarket's public Gamma API, pairs each one with a live match or fixture and refuses to guess when the pairing is ambiguous, then prints the market price next to the score, the server and a break-point flag, with the age of each feed. It never places orders and holds no wallet or key; it is a data layer for a bot you write yourself. The scores come from Live Tennis API, the paid service of the same team, whose free key allows 100 requests a day. MIT-licensed at github.com/livetennisapi/polymarket-tennis.

Features
  • Finds open tennis markets through Polymarket's Gamma API, filtered to match markets and moneylines
  • Pairs each market with a live match by player names and date, handling reversed order, accents and shared surnames
  • Returns nothing rather than a guess when two candidates are close, only one player agrees or the date is off by more than a day
  • One snapshot per market: both outcome prices beside the score line, the server, a break-point flag and the age of each feed
  • pmtennis command line for discover, match and watch, and the same functions as a Python library
How it trades
  • The code does what it says, and it says honestly what it is not. The README discloses that the toolkit is written by the team selling the score feed and calls it “vendor-authored tooling”, and the boundary is plain: no order code, no wallet, no keys, and an arena whose rules state that a paper rank says nothing about real trading, where fees, fills and latency exist. The hard part it solves is the identity problem, deciding which live match a market is about, and the matching rules are written out and covered by tests. Its own budget table is candid too: watching once a minute spends one request a poll, so the free key lasts about 100 minutes a day.
  • The popularity is not what it looks like. On Nov 9, 2026 the repo showed 256 stars and 217 forks, while the organisation's 29 other repositories had between none and two stars each. Of the 294 forks GitHub listed, all but two were made between Aug 18 and Aug 31, 2026, in daily bursts of up to 72, and 77 of their owners' accounts no longer exist; those still up mostly carry generated names such as a person's name with a number and a suffix. The two issues that prompted a code change came from accounts of the same kind. The package had 40 downloads from PyPI in the month to Nov 9. We read this as a paid boost, not a user base, and the star count should be ignored.
  • Read it as a well-made sample for a data product. Everything past the snapshot, deciding when to trade and placing the order, is left to you, and a live strategy would need a faster score feed than the free tier, which is where the paid plans come in. The arena's first season was the 2026 US Open; the repo and its site publish no results as of Nov 9, 2026.

What PolyScope does

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site. It picks 78 wallets for steady rather than large profit — a smooth equity curve, low concentration in a few markets, profit across many months — and shows each as a card with its niche (sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto or other), a stability score, its P&L, median position size, win rate, median return and share of profitable months, with a link to the full address. Cards flag wallets whose usual position is too big to copy on a normal account. Profiles are rebuilt overnight from Polymarket's data. There is no account, payment or alert; the site earns from referral links to the Overdog trading bot.

Features
  • 78 wallet profiles with combined P&L and a “data as of” date for the last rebuild
  • Stability score and sorting by stability or P&L
  • Filters by niche: sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto and other
  • Per wallet: P&L, median position size, win rate, median ROI, concentration and share of profitable months
  • “Accessible” or “High-capital” tag by median position size
How it trades
  • The selection idea is the right one for anyone thinking of copying: rank wallets by how evenly they made money, not by how much, and say outright which ones are too big to follow. The research page behind it describes cutting 512 profitable wallets to 314 and testing rules out of sample, and the about page promises limitations next to every result. Those are better habits than most wallet leaderboards show.
  • The P&L figures are close to Polymarket's but not the same. On Nov 13, 2026 the top three cards showed $31,930, $30,537 and $332,175 of “true P&L”; Polymarket's all-time profit for the same addresses was $30,720, $30,056 and $279,484. The site does not define “true P&L”, so we cannot say which way the third, 19% apart, is right. Every card we saw showed a 100% win rate, and the “earns from” and “current conviction” fields were empty or “no open positions” on the cards we looked at, so for now the dossier tells you who did well, not what they hold.
  • It is a free page on a content site, not a product with alerts or an API, and the commercial side is Overdog: a banner on the dossier and a review on the blog. The about page says referral links are marked rel="sponsored", and the disclaimer says the site is not affiliated with any platform it covers. Its editorial standards say it does not publish exact profit figures for traders it did not interview; the dossier, which publishes full addresses with exact P&L, does not follow that rule. A Polymarket builder named PolyScope with $548K of volume and 49 users appears in Polymarket's leaderboard; nothing on the site links to it.

More head-to-heads

Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.