PolyScope vs Predicts.guru

PolyScope and Predicts.guru are both filed under Platforms & Tools and Copy Trading and 1 more. Both are trading platforms, and both are free. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.

PolyScope preview

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site.

Compared with Predicts.guru
Predicts.guru preview

Free Polymarket analytics site built around a wallet checker.

Compared with PolyScope

At a glance

FactPolyScopePredicts.guru
TypeTrading platformTrading platform
CategoryPlatforms & ToolsPlatforms & Tools
Also listed inCopy Trading, Sports Trading, Politics & Elections, Crypto Markets, Sentiment / NewsSports Trading, Market Making, Copy Trading, Sniping
PricingFreeFree
Pricefreefree
Risk ratingMedium riskMedium risk
MarketsAll Polymarket marketsAll Polymarket markets, plus Polymarket Perps
SourceSource not publishedSource not published
Runs in TelegramNoNo
Listed sinceNov 13, 2026Nov 9, 2026

Highlighted rows differ

Key differences

  • They cover different markets: PolyScope lists All Polymarket markets, Predicts.guru lists All Polymarket markets, plus Polymarket Perps.
  • Only PolyScope is filed under Politics & Elections and Crypto Markets and 1 more, and only Predicts.guru is filed under Market Making and Sniping.

Choose PolyScope if…

  • you trade All Polymarket markets
  • your focus is Politics & Elections and Crypto Markets and 1 more

Choose Predicts.guru if…

  • you trade All Polymarket markets, plus Polymarket Perps
  • your focus is Market Making and Sniping

What PolyScope does

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site. It picks 78 wallets for steady rather than large profit — a smooth equity curve, low concentration in a few markets, profit across many months — and shows each as a card with its niche (sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto or other), a stability score, its P&L, median position size, win rate, median return and share of profitable months, with a link to the full address. Cards flag wallets whose usual position is too big to copy on a normal account. Profiles are rebuilt overnight from Polymarket's data. There is no account, payment or alert; the site earns from referral links to the Overdog trading bot.

Features
  • 78 wallet profiles with combined P&L and a “data as of” date for the last rebuild
  • Stability score and sorting by stability or P&L
  • Filters by niche: sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto and other
  • Per wallet: P&L, median position size, win rate, median ROI, concentration and share of profitable months
  • “Accessible” or “High-capital” tag by median position size
How it trades
  • The selection idea is the right one for anyone thinking of copying: rank wallets by how evenly they made money, not by how much, and say outright which ones are too big to follow. The research page behind it describes cutting 512 profitable wallets to 314 and testing rules out of sample, and the about page promises limitations next to every result. Those are better habits than most wallet leaderboards show.
  • The P&L figures are close to Polymarket's but not the same. On Nov 13, 2026 the top three cards showed $31,930, $30,537 and $332,175 of “true P&L”; Polymarket's all-time profit for the same addresses was $30,720, $30,056 and $279,484. The site does not define “true P&L”, so we cannot say which way the third, 19% apart, is right. Every card we saw showed a 100% win rate, and the “earns from” and “current conviction” fields were empty or “no open positions” on the cards we looked at, so for now the dossier tells you who did well, not what they hold.
  • It is a free page on a content site, not a product with alerts or an API, and the commercial side is Overdog: a banner on the dossier and a review on the blog. The about page says referral links are marked rel="sponsored", and the disclaimer says the site is not affiliated with any platform it covers. Its editorial standards say it does not publish exact profit figures for traders it did not interview; the dossier, which publishes full addresses with exact P&L, does not follow that rule. A Polymarket builder named PolyScope with $548K of volume and 49 users appears in Polymarket's leaderboard; nothing on the site links to it.

What Predicts.guru does

Free Polymarket analytics site built around a wallet checker. Paste an address or a username and it shows profit, open and closed positions, win rate, fees and the full trade history, with a P&L chart over time. Around it sit leaderboards, a radar for unusual buying, event and holder pages, a screener for new and closing markets, a liquidity-rewards scanner, a ranking of the apps that route orders into Polymarket, sports and Perps pages, and a tool that turns a wallet's P&L into a short video. There is no sign-up, no payment and no wallet connection; you trade on Polymarket yourself.

Features
  • Wallet report for any address or username: total and trading P&L, fees, maker and taker results, positions, trade history and a P&L timeline
  • Compare up to ten wallets side by side, and a bulk checker
  • Leaderboards for 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days and all time, by profit or volume, with sports leaderboards per league
  • Radar: recent buys scored 0–100 for size, fresh wallets, wallet record and markets where notable wallets buy the same side
  • Event pages with holders, flow and price history; feeds of new and closing markets
How it trades
  • The data is Polymarket's own, presented more fully. On Nov 9, 2026 the top five of the home page's 24-hour leaderboard matched Polymarket's daily profit leaderboard exactly, name for name and to the hundred dollars. The wallet pages draw on the same source, and the all-time rank we checked, #3,262,473, was Polymarket's figure too. What the site adds is the arrangement: positions, fees and history on one page, and comparisons Polymarket does not offer.
  • That arrangement is also where a careful reader should slow down. The 24-hour leader, mooseborzoi, showed +$249.6K for the day; its wallet page put the account at about −$9.4 million of trading P&L, −$13.5 million of total profit after $2.5 million of fees, and −$9.7 million in the page title, while a “Realized” tile read +$107,592 because only 440 of its 48,785 positions were loaded. Each number measures something different, and the Trade line, −$11.89 million, matched Polymarket's all-time figure. But a day's leaderboard says little about a trader, and the site's own wallet page is the best demonstration of that.
  • The Builders section is the part most relevant to this catalog. It ranks every app that routes orders through Polymarket by the volume credited to its builder code, and it says plainly that the fee column is each builder's own published rate, which it does not verify, and that an empty cell means nothing was published. The radar score is described as an investigation priority and not a forecast or proof of inside information, which is the right way to read it.

More head-to-heads

Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.