Convexly vs PolyScope

Convexly and PolyScope are both filed under Platforms & Tools and Copy Trading and 1 more. Both are trading platforms; Convexly is free with paid plans, PolyScope is free. Below: the facts side by side, where the two actually differ, and when each one is the better pick.

Convexly preview

Polymarket wallet checker that asks whether a record shows skill or luck.

Compared with PolyScope
PolyScope preview

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site.

Compared with Convexly

At a glance

FactConvexlyPolyScope
TypeTrading platformTrading platform
CategoryPlatforms & ToolsPlatforms & Tools
Also listed inCopy Trading, Sentiment / News, HedgingCopy Trading, Sports Trading, Politics & Elections, Crypto Markets, Sentiment / News
PricingFree tier, paid plansFree
Pricefree · from $9/mofree
Risk ratingMedium riskMedium risk
MarketsAll Polymarket markets; some research also covers ManifoldAll Polymarket markets
SourceSource not publishedSource not published
Runs in TelegramNoNo
Listed sinceNov 11, 2026Nov 13, 2026

Highlighted rows differ

Key differences

  • Convexly is free with paid plans (free · from $9/mo); PolyScope is free (free).
  • They cover different markets: Convexly lists All Polymarket markets; some research also covers Manifold, PolyScope lists All Polymarket markets.
  • Only Convexly is filed under Hedging, and only PolyScope is filed under Sports Trading and Politics & Elections and 1 more.

Choose Convexly if…

  • you trade All Polymarket markets; some research also covers Manifold
  • your focus is Hedging

Choose PolyScope if…

  • you trade All Polymarket markets
  • your focus is Sports Trading and Politics & Elections and 1 more

What Convexly does

Polymarket wallet checker that asks whether a record shows skill or luck. Paste an address and it shows the wallet's reported P&L, resolved positions and how much of its history the read actually covers, then how much of the profit came from the single biggest event, how its entry prices compared with outcomes, and an “Edge Score” ranking it against a fixed cohort of 8,656 wallets. The first check needs no account. Plans for watching wallets over time cost $9, $49 or $499 a month, and a one-off read of a wallet's settled positions reconciled against the Polygon chain costs $19. It does not trade or suggest whom to copy.

Features
  • Wallet check: reported P&L, resolved positions, latest trade captured and the coverage of the read
  • Concentration check showing what the result would be without the single biggest event
  • Entry price against settled outcome, with and without that event, and a Brier score
  • Edge Score: a historical percentile against 8,656 leaderboard wallets from April 2026
  • One-time $19 read of a wallet's settled positions rebuilt from Polygon, with the block it stops at
How it trades
  • The figures we checked are Polymarket's own. On Nov 11, 2026 the site's sample wallet, Trevio, showed $32,069.66 of reported P&L across 36 resolved positions, and Polymarket's all-time profit for that address was $32,069.66 to the cent. What Convexly adds is the context the profile does not give: one event contributed $31,964.42 of that total, and without it the wallet was up $105.24. For anyone choosing a wallet to follow, that one line is the useful part.
  • It is unusually careful about what it cannot show. The free check is labelled as available history only and “not lifetime P&L”, the home page reports that 31 of the 42 wallets on its public board had their full record rebuilt from Polygon on the day we looked, and the about page carries a correction from Aug 10, 2026 withdrawing an earlier claim that every result could be reproduced by a reader: the cohort behind the Edge Score has not been published. The score is a percentile against that April 2026 cohort, not a probability that a trader is skilled, and the site says so.
  • The prices climb steeply. Free covers a check and one watched wallet, and $9 a month covers three; the jump to $499 a month for Trader buys alerts polled every five minutes on 25 wallets, which is a slow feed next to the tools in this catalog that push fills within a second. The activity emails on the lower plans arrive at most once per wallet every 20 hours and say themselves that they can miss trades.

What PolyScope does

Free “Smart Money Dossier” on a Polymarket news and research site. It picks 78 wallets for steady rather than large profit — a smooth equity curve, low concentration in a few markets, profit across many months — and shows each as a card with its niche (sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto or other), a stability score, its P&L, median position size, win rate, median return and share of profitable months, with a link to the full address. Cards flag wallets whose usual position is too big to copy on a normal account. Profiles are rebuilt overnight from Polymarket's data. There is no account, payment or alert; the site earns from referral links to the Overdog trading bot.

Features
  • 78 wallet profiles with combined P&L and a “data as of” date for the last rebuild
  • Stability score and sorting by stability or P&L
  • Filters by niche: sports, geopolitics, politics, crypto and other
  • Per wallet: P&L, median position size, win rate, median ROI, concentration and share of profitable months
  • “Accessible” or “High-capital” tag by median position size
How it trades
  • The selection idea is the right one for anyone thinking of copying: rank wallets by how evenly they made money, not by how much, and say outright which ones are too big to follow. The research page behind it describes cutting 512 profitable wallets to 314 and testing rules out of sample, and the about page promises limitations next to every result. Those are better habits than most wallet leaderboards show.
  • The P&L figures are close to Polymarket's but not the same. On Nov 13, 2026 the top three cards showed $31,930, $30,537 and $332,175 of “true P&L”; Polymarket's all-time profit for the same addresses was $30,720, $30,056 and $279,484. The site does not define “true P&L”, so we cannot say which way the third, 19% apart, is right. Every card we saw showed a 100% win rate, and the “earns from” and “current conviction” fields were empty or “no open positions” on the cards we looked at, so for now the dossier tells you who did well, not what they hold.
  • It is a free page on a content site, not a product with alerts or an API, and the commercial side is Overdog: a banner on the dossier and a review on the blog. The about page says referral links are marked rel="sponsored", and the disclaimer says the site is not affiliated with any platform it covers. Its editorial standards say it does not publish exact profit figures for traders it did not interview; the dossier, which publishes full addresses with exact P&L, does not follow that rule. A Polymarket builder named PolyScope with $548K of volume and 49 users appears in Polymarket's leaderboard; nothing on the site links to it.

More head-to-heads

Every fact on this page is taken from the two listings as their authors publish them; POLBOTS verifies neither performance nor claims and has no stake in either tool. Nothing here is financial advice.